Author summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clay Drinko results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,620 of 9,490 authors). This Clay Drinko is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Clay Drinko
Author details
Total words: 2,032
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst