Author summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video1,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claude Solnik results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 1,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (5,998 of 8,706 authors). This Claude Solnik is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Claude Solnik
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠32%Claude Solnik (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,840
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos