Author summary
19% 1 analyzed article/video 832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizen results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 965 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,077 of 8,955 authors). This Citizen is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Citizen
Author details
Total words: 3,328
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst