Author summary
71% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Weber results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,035 hits . Analysis detected 8,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,175 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,843 of 9,487 authors). This Christopher Weber is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Christopher Weber
Author details
Total words: 11,175
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst