Author summary
23%1 analyzed article/video2,808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Britschgi results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Slippery Slope, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 609 hits. Analysis detected 4,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,234 of 8,753 authors). This Christian Britschgi is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Christian Britschgi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
6%Christian Britschgi (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,232
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751005.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos