Author summary
86%4 analyzed articles/videos3,797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Stein results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,856 hits. Analysis detected 14,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,592 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,587 of 9,287 authors). This Chris Stein is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Chris Stein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
51%Chris Stein (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,592
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate