Author summary
5% 2 analyzed articles/videos 662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Ramirez results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 159 hits . Analysis detected 981 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,096 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,531 of 8,788 authors). This Chris Ramirez is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Chris Ramirez
Author details
Total words: 2,096
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Tu Quoque: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst