Author summary
5%2 analyzed articles/videos662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Ramirez results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 981 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,096 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,531 of 8,788 authors). This Chris Ramirez is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Chris Ramirez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
38%Chris Ramirez (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,096
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Tu Quoque: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos