Author summary
ā 95% 1 analyzed article/video 124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Hamill-Stewart results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 167 hits . Analysis detected 932 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ā 96% (428 of 9,446 authors). This Chris Hamill-Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Chris Hamill-Stewart
Author details
Total words: 496
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.5% percentile 9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles496 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 33.7% 33.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 13.3% 13.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.3% 16.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 11.5% 11.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 33.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 16.3%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 13.3%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst