Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 1,937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Zilkha results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 721 hits . Analysis detected 5,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,250 of 9,483 authors). This Chloe Zilkha is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Chloe Zilkha
Author details
Total words: 7,748
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst