Author summary
65% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Pulliam-Moore results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 1,363 hits . Analysis detected 6,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,178 of 9,487 authors). This Charles Pulliam-Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Charles Pulliam-Moore
Author details
Total words: 8,028
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst