Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Champe Barton results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 387 hits . Analysis detected 2,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,420 of 8,803 authors). This Champe Barton is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Champe Barton
Author details
Total words: 4,300
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst