Author summary
14% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Ho results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Indoctrination , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 293 hits . Analysis detected 2,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,868 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,768 of 9,074 authors). This Catherine Ho is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Catherine Ho
Author details
Total words: 5,868
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst