Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cassie Martin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 123 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (5,694 of 9,207 authors). This Cassie Martin is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Cassie Martin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠39%Cassie Martin (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,644
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 5.0%5.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos