Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carys Anderson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 1,109 hits . Analysis detected 3,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,184 of 8,963 authors). This Carys Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Carys Anderson
Author details
Total words: 3,456
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.1% 32.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst