Author summary
19%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candice James results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,073 of 8,788 authors). This Candice James is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Candice James
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
77%Candice James (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.2%2.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos