Author summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video2,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camille Vocelka results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 2,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (8,575 of 9,483 authors). This Camille Vocelka is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Camille Vocelka
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠10%Camille Vocelka (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,172
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

10% percentile
02550751009.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos