Author summary
â 23% 1 analyzed article/video 2,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camille Vocelka results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 622 hits . Analysis detected 2,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of â 10% (8,575 of 9,483 authors). This Camille Vocelka is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Camille Vocelka
Author details
Total words: 8,172
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst