Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Camilla Forte results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 361 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,050 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,706 authors). This Camilla Forte is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Camilla Forte
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Camilla Forte (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,050
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 20.8%20.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Optimism Bias: Author 20.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos