Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camila Grigera Naón results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 213 hits . Analysis detected 1,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,418 of 9,471 authors). This Camila Grigera Naón is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Camila Grigera Naón
Author details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.0% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.9% 14.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.7% 10.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst