Author summary
62%1 analyzed article/video782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caleb Petitt results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 2,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,372 of 9,471 authors). This Caleb Petitt is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Caleb Petitt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
75%Caleb Petitt (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,128
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.7%2.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos