Author summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These (c) 2026 results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Recency Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 446 hits . Analysis detected 2,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,443 of 8,797 authors). This (c) 2026 is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. (c) 2026
Author details
Total words: 3,952
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst