Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burak Oktenli results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 524 hits . Analysis detected 3,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,442 of 9,140 authors). This Burak Oktenli is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Burak Oktenli
Author details
Total words: 2,484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.2% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 17.5% 17.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.1% 9.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.1% 21.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.4% 11.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 17.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Composition/Division: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst