Author summary
⁠52%6 analyzed articles/videos7,961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryan Walsh results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 3,887 hits. Analysis detected 32,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,232 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (6,983 of 8,785 authors). This Bryan Walsh is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Bryan Walsh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠21%Bryan Walsh (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 44,232
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles44.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.8%8.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos