Author summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruno V. Manno results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,626 hits . Analysis detected 7,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,596 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (7,274 of 9,468 authors). This Bruno V. Manno is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Bruno V. Manno
Author details
Total words: 12,596
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst