Author summary
29% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Owens results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 2,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,508 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,500 of 9,520 authors). This Brian Owens is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Brian Owens
Author details
Total words: 5,508
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst