Author summary
90%1 analyzed article/video902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Bechtel results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 3,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,450 of 8,572 authors). This Brendan Bechtel is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Brendan Bechtel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
72%Brendan Bechtel (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.4%7.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 9.6%9.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos