Author summary
52%1 analyzed article/video1,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boone Ashworth results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 616 hits. Analysis detected 4,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (4,919 of 8,616 authors). This Boone Ashworth is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Boone Ashworth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
43%Boone Ashworth (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos