Author summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video1,028 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Johnson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 854 hits. Analysis detected 2,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (4,439 of 9,471 authors). This Bob Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Bob Johnson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠54%Bob Johnson (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,112
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 20.8%20.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 20.8%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos