Author summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Sniffin results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 307 hits . Analysis detected 2,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,504 of 8,861 authors). This Bill Sniffin is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Bill Sniffin
Author details
Total words: 3,436
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst