Author summary
⁠95%5 analyzed articles/videos4,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Addison results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 9,609 hits. Analysis detected 42,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,484 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (3,333 of 9,078 authors). This Bill Addison is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Bill Addison
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠64%Bill Addison (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 34,484
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles34.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.9%27.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos