Author summary
61%1 analyzed article/video1,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These BERNARD CONDON Associated Press results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 2,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,377 of 9,206 authors). This BERNARD CONDON Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
BERNARD CONDON Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
42%BERNARD CONDON Associated Press (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,136
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510041.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos