Author summary
63%2 analyzed articles/videos1,608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin S. Weiss results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 4,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,740 of 9,471 authors). This Benjamin S. Weiss is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Benjamin S. Weiss
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
50%Benjamin S. Weiss (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,432
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate