Author summary
91%3 analyzed articles/videos2,432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Burgis results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,153 hits. Analysis detected 11,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,728 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,802 of 9,471 authors). This Ben Burgis is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Ben Burgis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
60%Ben Burgis (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,728
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos