Author summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Boychuk results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,238 hits . Analysis detected 8,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (4,064 of 9,471 authors). This Ben Boychuk is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Ben Boychuk
Author details
Total words: 7,164
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst