Author summary
4% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bayla Orton results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 1.9% saturation with 298 hits . Analysis detected 2,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,840 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (9,424 of 9,471 authors). This Bayla Orton is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Bayla Orton
Author details
Total words: 15,840
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 0.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst