Author summary
4% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Araceli Ramirez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 2.1% saturation with 225 hits . Analysis detected 1,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (9,401 of 9,471 authors). This Araceli Ramirez is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Araceli Ramirez
Author details
Total words: 10,520
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 0.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst