Author summary
23%1 analyzed article/video309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANNA WILDER — Associated Press/Report for America results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 537 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,955 of 8,696 authors). This ANNA WILDER — Associated Press/Report for America is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
ANNA WILDER — Associated Press/Report for America
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
66%ANNA WILDER — Associated Press/Report for America (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,236
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 5.0%5.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos