Author summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Miller results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 1,117 hits . Analysis detected 5,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,338 of 9,471 authors). This Anna Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Anna Miller
Author details
Total words: 5,544
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.1% 20.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst