Author summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna-Lysa Gayle results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 170 hits . Analysis detected 1,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,972 of 9,471 authors). This Anna-Lysa Gayle is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. Anna-Lysa Gayle
Author details
Total words: 1,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 7.9% 7.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst