Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Isaac results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,435 hits . Analysis detected 8,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,675 of 9,486 authors). This Anna Isaac is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Anna Isaac
Author details
Total words: 8,084
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst