Author summary
57%1 analyzed article/video577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Donnelly results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,833 of 8,957 authors). This Ann Donnelly is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Ann Donnelly
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
58%Ann Donnelly (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,308
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos