Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 1,690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Romano results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 575 hits . Analysis detected 3,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,716 of 9,464 authors). This Andrew Romano is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Andrew Romano
Author details
Total words: 6,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst