Author summary
81%1 analyzed article/video693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANDRÈ COLEMAN results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 2,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,481 of 9,332 authors). This ANDRÈ COLEMAN is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
ANDRÈ COLEMAN
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
85%ANDRÈ COLEMAN (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,772
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Personal Incredulity: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos