Author summary
93% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Qin results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 2,091 hits . Analysis detected 21,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,988 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,767 of 9,483 authors). This Amy Qin is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Amy Qin
Author details
Total words: 18,988
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles19K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst