Author summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Annette results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (7,721 of 8,600 authors). This Amy Annette is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Amy Annette
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠11%Amy Annette (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos