Author summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanuel Asfaw results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 866 hits . Analysis detected 5,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,723 of 9,486 authors). This Amanuel Asfaw is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Amanuel Asfaw
Author details
Total words: 5,248
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.5% 16.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst