Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Moore results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 3,203 hits. Analysis detected 12,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,072 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,709 of 9,471 authors). This Amanda Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Amanda Moore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
72%Amanda Moore (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,072
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.9%28.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos