Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Milkovits results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 416 hits . Analysis detected 2,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,713 of 8,706 authors). This Amanda Milkovits is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Amanda Milkovits
Author details
Total words: 2,772
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 12.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst