Author summary
72% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Gerut results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 7,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,356 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,306 of 8,732 authors). This Amanda Gerut is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Amanda Gerut
Author details
Total words: 10,356
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst