Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These ALLISON PECORIN results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Recency Bias, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 181 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This ALLISON PECORIN is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
ALLISON PECORIN
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%ALLISON PECORIN (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,216
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos