Author summary
34%1 analyzed article/video698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allan Smith results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,336 of 8,706 authors). This Allan Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Allan Smith
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
51%Allan Smith (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,792
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos